All Posts by Empower Wisconsin

Election fraud? Patty Schachtner was not confined

Empower Wisconsin | Dec. 18, 2020

By M.D. Kittle 

MADISON — Outgoing state Sen. Patty Schachtner, a full-time county medical examiner, earlier this year claimed to be “indefinitely confined,” receiving the special status accorded under state election law. The Democrat and her husband signed a statement claiming they were confined to their home “because of age, physical illness or infirmity” in seeking an absentee ballot to be automatically sent to their Somerset home. 

It begs the question: If the lawmaker is “indefinitely confined,” how has she performed her duties as St. Croix County’s Medical Examiner these past six months?  

Medical Examiner wouldn’t seem to be a remote gig. The St. Croix Medical Examiner’s Office’s mission is “to serve the public with trained medicolegal death investigators to ensure accurate and scientific investigations when determining cause and manner of death,” according to the M.E.’s website. 

An official from the St. Croix Register of Deeds office told Empower Wisconsin that Schachtner has signed the county’s death certificates over the past several months — since she applied for indefinitely confined status in June. 

If the senator was in the field performing death investigations, she certainly was not “indefinitely confined” under the meaning and intent of state statute. 

So, did the lawmaker break the law? 

That question came up earlier this week. 

In-person voting 

Conservative talk show host Dan O’Donnell in a piece for the MacIver Institute, opined that Schachtner “all but confirmed that she herself had committed election fraud” earlier this week when she, as one of Wisconsin’s 10 electors, cast her ballot for Joe Biden at the State Capitol. 

As she cast her electoral vote for Joe Biden in Madison (roughly 250 miles away from her home in Somerset) on Monday, Schachtner proved that she was in no way confined because of age, physical illness, infirmity, or physical disability. She managed to get to the Capitol just fine.”

In November, Schachtner lost her 10th Senate District re-election bid to state Rep. Rob Stafsholt. She wasn’t confined during the entire campaign. 

Just six days before the August primary, Schachtner spoke at the grand opening of a Kwik Trip store in New Richmond, O’Donnell reported. 

“So unconcerned was she about her health that during the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic she didn’t even wear a mask as she spoke,” he wrote. 

There’s more. 

According to her official Facebook page, she went to Ted’s Pizza Palace in Menominee on Sept. 15 and joined State Treasurer Sarah Godlewski for an event in River Falls on Oct. 8, O’Donnell noted. 

“She found time for leisure activities, too. On September 26th, she posted a picture of herself and her husband ‘going out and enjoy[ing] all the wonderful natural resources that our state has to offer.’

So much for confined. 

Active M.E. 

Schachtner didn’t answer Empower Wisconsin’s two phone messages on Thursday seeking comment. 

As for her St. Croix County position, a New York Times piece last month sang the praises of a clairvoyant medical examiner who “took masks to funeral homes … dropped off body bags at nursing homes” and “rented a refrigerated truck to store even more bodies,” long before the pandemic surged as the weather turned colder. The Times story painted a picture of very active M.E. working against time, a deadly pandemic and — in usual New York Times elitism — the stupidity of local rural citizenry who wouldn’t mask up or stay home. 

In another assertion that appears to stand in conflict with Schachtner’s Facebook posts, the Times piece claimed the candidate “did not hold campaign events or knock on doors, worried that it was not a safe practice.” The reporter added, “her Republican opponent won easily,” as if to suggest that if it wasn’t for that darn COVID … 

One of the more concerning allegations of election fraud raised before and after Nov. 3 involves the liberal — in every sense of the word — use of indefinitely confined status. Clerks in liberal bastions Dane and Milwaukee counties in March advised anyone could use the threat of COVID-19 as a reason for being indefinitely confined. The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled otherwise. But the damage was done. 

As the MacIver Institute reported, Schachtner and roughly 178,000 other Wisconsinites applied for the special status, which excuses them from voter ID requirements. The MacIver Institute found that the number of indefinitely confined voters rose by a staggering 238 percent this year, and many of them were not actually confined to their homes.

“The Republican Party of Wisconsin tried to warn everyone that election laws would be abused last Spring, shortly after clerks illegally advised the use of indefinite confinement to dodge photo I.D. safeguards,” the state GOP said in a statement. “It’s clear now that many individuals – including powerful elected officials – abused that system when they weren’t indefinitely confined. WEC and the Legislature must look at addressing this before the next election.”

In an interview with Wispolitics.com earlier this week, Schachtner said she claimed the status because her husband is a cancer survivor and she was trying to do her part to be safe. She also claimed she’s received threats since O’Donnell reported on her confinement status. 

And Schachtner claimed ignorance, insisting she didn’t know voters who claim the status should notify their clerks once they no longer qualify for it. She insists she’s a “legal voter, pure and simple.” 

In an unanimous decision this week, the state Supreme Court ruled individual electors are responsible for determining whether they are indefinitely confined. That determination, though, may only be based upon “age, physical illness or infirmity.” The court said a voter can’t use someone else’s age or illness to claim the status. 

Schachtner clearly didn’t fit into the “indefinitely confined” parameters under state law. You can’t make a false statement to the municipal clerk, board of election commissioners, or any other election officials. Doing so is a felony, punishable by 3 1/2 years in prison and fines of up to $10,000. 

Listen to more:

Explore More
Audit: Evers’ DWD fails to comply with federal law

Audit: Evers’ DWD fails to comply with federal law

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — Gov. Tony Evers’ dysfunctional Department of Workforce Development continues to fail Wisconsinites, according to a…

Read More »

August 1, 2021
Tool of the Week: Assembly Dems, Evers’ useful idiots

Tool of the Week: Assembly Dems, Evers’ useful idiots

MADISON — They say there’s strength in numbers. There’s also idiocy. Exhibit A: The 38 Democrats in the Wisconsin Assembly….

Read More »

August 1, 2021
‘Education Governor’ kills funding to school for students with autism

‘Education Governor’ kills funding to school for students with autism

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — There is a small charter school in Wisconsin’s Northwoods that parents, students and community members…

Read More »

August 1, 2021
Pelosi’s COVID Cops threaten to arrest mask defiers

Pelosi’s COVID Cops threaten to arrest mask defiers

By Zachary Evans, National Review U.S. Capitol Police were authorized to arrest visitors and staff as of Wednesday for refusal…

Read More »

July 30, 2021
Bill would prohibit Zuckerbucks in elections

Bill would prohibit Zuckerbucks in elections

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — A bill co-sponsored by U.S. Rep. Scott Fitzgerald would put an end to “Zuckerbucks” and…

Read More »

July 30, 2021
All Woke Up: Imperialist surfing

All Woke Up: Imperialist surfing

A painfully Woke professor is making waves with his column in The Washington Post  that claims surfing became an Olympic…

Read More »

July 29, 2021

1 thought on “Election fraud? Patty Schachtner was not confined

  • “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.” “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.” Schactner’s use of “indefinitely confined” confirms that we now live in Wonderland.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *