Evers’ team’s sneak attack on property rights

Empower Wisconsin | Feb. 17,  2020 

By M.D. Kittle 

MADISON — The Evers administration and their government lobbying pals just got busted trying to sneak in a change to Wisconsin’s Homeowners’ Bill of Rights that would have watered down protections against unwanted home assessments. 

Billed as a mere technical change to the 2018 law, the legislation would loosen language that requires assessors, when requesting to view the interior of a residence, to provide written notice informing property owners of their right to refuse entry. The bill changes just one word, replacing “notice” with “information.” But that one word changes the intent of the legislation, according to the statute’s author, Sen. David Craig.

“It would victimize people all over again,” the Town of Vernon Republican said. 

Craig’s provision was part of a broader package of property rights bills written by Sen. Tom Tiffany (R-Hazelhurst) and then-Rep. Adam Jarchow (R-Balsam Lake). For full disclosure, Jarchow serves as president of Empower Wisconsin’s news organization. 

Craig wrote the accessor piece following a property rights lawsuit in the Town of Dover. Homeowners Vincent Milewski and Morganne MacDonald sued the local government, its Board of Review and the company contracted to conduct property assessments for the town. The property owners alleged their constitutional rights were violated when they refused to let an assessor into their home and then were not allowed to challenge the resulting assessment.

State law at the time did not restrict property owners from denying accessors access, but it did prevent them from appealing final assessments. 

Craig argued the law was unconstitutional, violating the Fourth and Fourteenth amendments on unreasonable search and seizure and due process. 

Craig said the “technical” change, sought by Evers’ Department of Revenue, would undermine the core of the property rights legislation, opening the door for assessors to enter the home without providing proper notice of rights. 

Sources say the Wisconsin Towns Association is lobbying hard for the revisions. Local governments don’t care for a law that prevents assessors from getting a complete look at the home — in the pursuit of local tax collections.  

“There has been different interpretations of the word notice by assessors, local government officials and DOR (Department of Revenue),” the agency wrote in a legislative proposal summary.  

But Joseph Kreye, Legal Services Manager for the Wisconsin Legislative Reference Bureau, said he’s not sure why the Evers Administration wants the change in the first place. 

“I can only speculate that DOR believes using the word ‘notice’ implies certain substantive and procedural due process requirements not implicated by using the word ‘information’ and that DOR is, consequently, more comfortable with using the word ‘information’ and perhaps avoiding legal implications,” Kreye wrote in a memo.

So, Evers’ Revenue team is more “comfortable” easing up on language that would protect constitutional rights and get them off the hook legally. 

It is not a difference without a distinction. Kreye notes in the memo that Wisconsin statutes contain more than 8,500 instances of “notice” and all seem to use the term as it is generally understood: to give the public notice of rights, proceedings, and governmental events. Notice is more formal, packs more legal weight. Just the kind of protections property owners were promised under the Homeowners’ Bill of Rights.

Assembly Bill 881 appeared to be on the fast track for a vote this week, but several lawmakers have raised red flags about the substantial changes to the law. 

More so, Craig is raising concerns about the effort from the Evers administration, bending to the will of government lobbyists like the Towns Association and the League of Municipalities, to sneak through a dramatic change to a law. The senator said it was fortunate staff members with knowledge of the law caught the subtle one-word alteration. Lawmakers on the review committee apparently did not. 

“This merits a deeper look into how this bill came about,” Craig said. “This Legislature has to take even more serious these bills coming forward and we need to look at reforming if not eliminating this now-abused process.” 

Listen to more:


Explore More

  • Biden’s bad deal with Vlad

    Empower Wisconsin | Dec. 9, 2022 By Jim Geraghty, National Review. Today you’re going to hear a lot of people…

  • All Woke Up: Kind of a drag

    Empower Wisconsin | Dec. 9, 2022 Let’s just say American morality is experiencing some growing pains.  In woke library land,…

  • The real-world costs of Biden’s radical climate policies

    Empower Wisconsin | Dec. 9, 2022 By M.D. Kittle  MADISON — U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson and his Republican colleagues sent…

  • Evers 2.0: Will liberal governor go farther left?

    Empower Wisconsin | Dec. 8, 2022 By M.D. Kittle MADISON — Fresh off his re-election win, look for Gov. Tony…

  • Spotlight: Evers’ TikTok shop

    Wisconsin Spotlight | Dec. 8, 2022 By Heather Smith, MacIver Institute  MADISON — This week, members of Wisconsin’s congressional delegation…

  • Born says JFC will check Evers’ spending, drive tax relief

    Empower Wisconsin | Dec. 7, 2022 By M.D. Kittle MADISON — State Rep. Mark Born, co-chair of the Legislature’s Joint…

  1. William Chapman Avatar
    William Chapman

    Stay out on the street and do your assessment… No way am I letting them in my house……

  2. Mary Jane Pellegrinetti Avatar
    Mary Jane Pellegrinetti

    Everything about that is disgusting. And it’s the way Democrats do everything. Change a word here, change a word there, next thing you know . . . you’ve lost one more right or protection.

  3. Vince Milewski Avatar
    Vince Milewski

    Our family fought a long and hard uphill battle against the unconstitutional treatment we received at the hands of our local property assessor. Shame on the Evers team for trying to undue the legislation that Senator Craig worked so hard to get passed. The Homeowners Bill of Rights should be just that – rights. Privacy and due process are fundamental rights that should not be stripped away again.

  4. Cat Avatar
    Cat

    No one comes in my house either.

  5. Harold Wilkes Avatar
    Harold Wilkes

    Shawano did it right with notice and no harassment (so far). However I will be watching now for this type of sneaky activity in the future. Thanks for the update.

  6. Harold Wilkes Avatar
    Harold Wilkes

    3. does not display Convention of States info; it shows 2. again

  7. ronald weitzel Avatar
    ronald weitzel

    THESE CRIMINALS DON’T NEED TO COME IN OUR HOMES. THEY CAN STAY ON THE ROAD.

  8. Mark A. Stolp Jr. Avatar
    Mark A. Stolp Jr.

    I wonder how that would work in a rental situation. A landlord is required to give tenants at least 12 hour notice before entry of the home.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *