All Posts by Empower Wisconsin

Is there still room for debate? 

Empower Wisconsin | June 16, 2020

By Andrew Sullivan, New York Magazine 

In the last couple of weeks, as the purges of alleged racists have intensified in every sphere, and as so many corporations, associations, and all manner of civic institutions have openly pledged allegiance to anti-racism, with all the workshops, books, and lectures that come with it, I’m reminded of a Václav Havel essay, “The Power of the Powerless.”

It’s about the dilemma of living in a world where adherence to a particular ideology becomes mandatory. In Communist Czechoslovakia, this orthodoxy, with its tired slogans, and abuse of language, had to be enforced brutally by the state, its spies, and its informers. In America, of course, with the First Amendment, this is impossible. But perhaps for that very reason, Americans have always been good at policing uniformity by and among themselves. The puritanical streak of shaming and stigmatizing and threatening runs deep. This is the country of extraordinary political and cultural freedom, but it is also the country of religious fanaticism, moral panics, and crusades against vice. It’s the country of The Scarlet Letter and Prohibition and the Hollywood blacklist and the Lavender Scare. The kind of stifling, suffocating, and nerve-racking atmosphere that Havel evokes is chillingly recognizable in American history and increasingly in the American present.

The new orthodoxy — what the writer Wesley Yang has described as the “successor ideology” to liberalism — seems to be rooted in what journalist Wesley Lowery calls “moral clarity.” He told Times media columnist Ben Smith this week that journalism needs to be rebuilt around that moral clarity, which means ending its attempt to see all sides of a story, when there is only one, and dropping even an attempt at objectivity (however unattainable that ideal might be). And what is the foundational belief of such moral clarity? That America is systemically racist, and a white-supremacist project from the start, that, as Lowery put it in The Atlantic, “the justice system — in fact, the entire American experiment — was from its inception designed to perpetuate racial inequality.” (Wesley Lowery objected to this characterization of his beliefs — read his Twitter thread about it here.)

This is an argument that deserves to be aired openly in a liberal society, especially one with such racial terror and darkness in its past and inequality in the present. But it is an argument that equally deserves to be engaged, challenged, questioned, interrogated. There is truth in it, truth that it’s incumbent on us to understand more deeply and empathize with more thoroughly. But there is also an awful amount of truth it ignores or elides or simply denies.

It sees America as in its essence not about freedom but oppression. It argues, in fact, that all the ideals about individual liberty, religious freedom, limited government, and the equality of all human beings were always a falsehood to cover for and justify and entrench the enslavement of human beings under the fiction of race. It wasn’t that these values competed with the poison of slavery, and eventually overcame it, in an epic, bloody civil war whose casualties were overwhelmingly white. It’s that the liberal system is itself a form of white supremacy — which is why racial inequality endures and why liberalism’s core values and institutions cannot be reformed and can only be dismantled.

This view of the world certainly has “moral clarity.” What it lacks is moral complexity. 

Read more at nymag.com

Listen to more:

Explore More
Leaving Joe Biden

Leaving Joe Biden

Empower Wisconsin | Jan. 20,  2022 After one year in office, President Joe Biden’s approval ratings have plummeted. He’s lost…

Read More »

January 20, 2022
Alex Lasry ‘standing up to China’ after making a mint off China stocks

Alex Lasry ‘standing up to China’ after making a mint off China stocks

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — Alex Lasry picked a bad time to roll out a campaign ad insisting he’d “stand…

Read More »

January 20, 2022
Conflict of Interest? WEDC board member’s biz benefits from Evers’ grant

Conflict of Interest? WEDC board member’s biz benefits from Evers’ grant

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — When Gov. Tony Evers announced he was handing out $60 million in federal COVID relief…

Read More »

January 20, 2022
Republicans unveil bills to take on worker shortage crisis

Republicans unveil bills to take on worker shortage crisis

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — Pledging to remove government-created barriers that have worsened Wisconsin’s worker shortage crisis, Republican lawmakers on…

Read More »

January 19, 2022
Spotlight: Expensive medicine

Spotlight: Expensive medicine

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — The people of Walker Forge have been around long enough to know that “tough times…

Read More »

January 19, 2022
Lawmakers: Time to end Chisholm’s ‘catch-and-release’ bail policies

Lawmakers: Time to end Chisholm’s ‘catch-and-release’ bail policies

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — A Milwaukee police officer shot multiple times late last week while reportedly trying to break…

Read More »

January 19, 2022

1 thought on “Is there still room for debate? 

  • Interesting read in that one side wants to debate, discuss, analyze and air all sides of an issue. The other side pretends, just like Al Gore, that the science / debate is settled. End of discussion.

    NOPE. The issue is still open for Debate, lots of debate, months and months of debate, which is not violent, by those who want to debate.

    Unfortunately, violent may be the “form of debate” by those who do not want to debate.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *