Avatar
All Posts by Empower Wisconsin

Is there still room for debate? 

Empower Wisconsin | June 16, 2020

By Andrew Sullivan, New York Magazine 

In the last couple of weeks, as the purges of alleged racists have intensified in every sphere, and as so many corporations, associations, and all manner of civic institutions have openly pledged allegiance to anti-racism, with all the workshops, books, and lectures that come with it, I’m reminded of a Václav Havel essay, “The Power of the Powerless.”

It’s about the dilemma of living in a world where adherence to a particular ideology becomes mandatory. In Communist Czechoslovakia, this orthodoxy, with its tired slogans, and abuse of language, had to be enforced brutally by the state, its spies, and its informers. In America, of course, with the First Amendment, this is impossible. But perhaps for that very reason, Americans have always been good at policing uniformity by and among themselves. The puritanical streak of shaming and stigmatizing and threatening runs deep. This is the country of extraordinary political and cultural freedom, but it is also the country of religious fanaticism, moral panics, and crusades against vice. It’s the country of The Scarlet Letter and Prohibition and the Hollywood blacklist and the Lavender Scare. The kind of stifling, suffocating, and nerve-racking atmosphere that Havel evokes is chillingly recognizable in American history and increasingly in the American present.

The new orthodoxy — what the writer Wesley Yang has described as the “successor ideology” to liberalism — seems to be rooted in what journalist Wesley Lowery calls “moral clarity.” He told Times media columnist Ben Smith this week that journalism needs to be rebuilt around that moral clarity, which means ending its attempt to see all sides of a story, when there is only one, and dropping even an attempt at objectivity (however unattainable that ideal might be). And what is the foundational belief of such moral clarity? That America is systemically racist, and a white-supremacist project from the start, that, as Lowery put it in The Atlantic, “the justice system — in fact, the entire American experiment — was from its inception designed to perpetuate racial inequality.” (Wesley Lowery objected to this characterization of his beliefs — read his Twitter thread about it here.)

This is an argument that deserves to be aired openly in a liberal society, especially one with such racial terror and darkness in its past and inequality in the present. But it is an argument that equally deserves to be engaged, challenged, questioned, interrogated. There is truth in it, truth that it’s incumbent on us to understand more deeply and empathize with more thoroughly. But there is also an awful amount of truth it ignores or elides or simply denies.

It sees America as in its essence not about freedom but oppression. It argues, in fact, that all the ideals about individual liberty, religious freedom, limited government, and the equality of all human beings were always a falsehood to cover for and justify and entrench the enslavement of human beings under the fiction of race. It wasn’t that these values competed with the poison of slavery, and eventually overcame it, in an epic, bloody civil war whose casualties were overwhelmingly white. It’s that the liberal system is itself a form of white supremacy — which is why racial inequality endures and why liberalism’s core values and institutions cannot be reformed and can only be dismantled.

This view of the world certainly has “moral clarity.” What it lacks is moral complexity. 

Read more at nymag.com

Listen to more:

Explore More
House election bill aims to kill voter integrity

House election bill aims to kill voter integrity

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — House Democrats this week are ramming through a bill that would take away Wisconsin’s control…

Read More »

March 2, 2021
McFarland teacher loses his COVID safe space

McFarland teacher loses his COVID safe space

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — McFarland School District officials say they are removing a plastic-covered enclosure a teacher had been…

Read More »

March 2, 2021
Could Michigan governor face investigation?

Could Michigan governor face investigation?

By Brittany Bernstein, National Review Michigan Republicans are calling for an investigation into Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s policy that forced long-term…

Read More »

March 2, 2021
Pompeo on the future

Pompeo on the future

Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo says the conservative movement in America is alive and well, despite the very public…

Read More »

March 2, 2021
Tool of the Week: Out of touch lawmakers

Tool of the Week: Out of touch lawmakers

MADISON — We’ve got two Tools this week, which should give you a pretty good idea of how bad last…

Read More »

March 1, 2021
Madison teachers warned against COVID strike

Madison teachers warned against COVID strike

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — Two public-interest law firms are warning Madison’s teachers union that it could face a lawsuit…

Read More »

March 1, 2021

1 thought on “Is there still room for debate? 

  • Interesting read in that one side wants to debate, discuss, analyze and air all sides of an issue. The other side pretends, just like Al Gore, that the science / debate is settled. End of discussion.

    NOPE. The issue is still open for Debate, lots of debate, months and months of debate, which is not violent, by those who want to debate.

    Unfortunately, violent may be the “form of debate” by those who do not want to debate.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *