All Posts by Empower Wisconsin

Republicans get big win in redistricting battle

By M.D. Kittle

MADISON — In a huge win for Republicans, the Wisconsin Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed it would take a “least change” approach in settling new state and congressional boundaries for the next decade.

The 4-3 ruling means the state’s high court will make only minimal changes to the current maps drawn up in 2011 by a Republican Legislature and governor. In short, the disputed maps will reflect the changes in the state’s population over the past 10 years, but they won’t be driven by political ideas of representational fairness.

“The United States Supreme Court recently declared there are no legal standards by which judges may decide whether maps are politically ‘fair.’… We agree,” wrote Justice Rebecca G. Bradley in the majority opinion held by the court’s four conservatives.

Wisconsin’s constitution requires the legislature — a political body — to establish legislative districts, Bradley wrote. Just as the laws enacted by the legislature reflect policy choices, so will the maps drawn by that political body.

“Claims of political unfairness in the maps present political questions, not legal ones,” Bradley wrote. “Such claims have no basis in the constitution or any other law and therefore must be resolved through the political process and not by the judiciary.”

Gov. Tony Evers vetoed the Republican drawn maps passed last month by the Legislature. The Democrat claimed the redistricting plan was another round of gerrymandering by legislative Republicans. In his attacks, the governor omitted some inescapable facts.

Political boundaries drawn by Evers’ own People’s Maps Commission have been roundly criticized for Democratic Party power plays and for violating federal voting laws. Even Democrats hated the maps. Legislative Democrats voted against them, with Rep. Sylvia Ortiz-Valez (D-Milwaukee) blasting the commission’s dissolution of black and Latino districts.

“A map that cancels out our voices, cracks and dilutes our vote, is immoral and it’s wrong,” she said.

The role of the court, Bradley wrote, is to make sure population adjustments to congressional and state legislative districts are made so no eligible voter’s vote is diluted. Politics is left to the politicians.

Justice Brian Hagedorn, while joining the majority, filed a concurring opinion asserting the court’s role may go beyond the purely legal or constitutional requirements. Hagedorn, who has broken with his fellow conservatives on high profile cases pitting the Legislature against Evers, wants to leave the door open to consider factors such as “communities of interest” in addressing political boundaries.

Justice Rebecca Dallet wrote the dissenting opinion for the court’s three liberals. The ruling, she warns, will have “devastating consequences for representative government in Wisconsin.”

Dallet insists again that the federal courts are the proper venue to resolve a state’s differences over political boundaries, that the state Supreme Court has no business getting into “the political thickets” of redistricting. But Dallet is already there.

As Empower Wisconsin has reported, Dallet’s bid for the bench in 2018 benefitted from at least $140,000 in political ads from former Obama Attorney General Eric Holder and his liberal gerrymandering group. Holder’s National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC) has injected itself into redistricting lawsuits, which could be a problem for Dallet who has said justices should recuse themselves from cases involving financial supporters of their campaigns.

As of Tuesday, NDRC had not entered the Wisconsin redistricting fray. But a group known as BLOC — Black Leaders Organizing for Communities — is a petitioner in the litigation before the Supreme Court. BLOC argued against the minimalist approach. BLOC also took credit for elevating Dallet to victory in 2018. The group openly claimed it was funded by NDRC.

Anthony LoCoco, deputy counsel for the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, said the majority decision recognizes the proper role of the judiciary in the redistricting process. WILL is a petitioner in the case.

“We are pleased that the Court agreed with our arguments that political partisanship is not an appropriate factor to consider when redrawing district maps and that it should follow a least-changes approach in accomplishing its task,” LoCoco said.

Listen to more:

Explore More
Spotlight: Racine sued over voting van

Spotlight: Racine sued over voting van

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — The city of Racine’s use of its “polling booth on wheels” violates Wisconsin election law,…

Read More »

December 2, 2022
Return the surplus to taxpayers

Return the surplus to taxpayers

By Owen Robinson, Boots & Sabers With the state’s coffers overflowing, every hog is at the trough jostling for position…

Read More »

December 2, 2022
How to destroy the U.S…

How to destroy the U.S…

By Victor Davis Hanson First, you would surrender our prior energy independence. Reduce new gas and oil leases on federal…

Read More »

December 2, 2022
Marquette Poll: Biden underwater, DeSantis stock rising

Marquette Poll: Biden underwater, DeSantis stock rising

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — The latest Marquette University Law School national poll shows President Joe Biden remains underwater and…

Read More »

December 2, 2022
Evers’ DNR turning harder left

Evers’ DNR turning harder left

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — Gov. Tony Evers has radicalized the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, and things look to…

Read More »

December 1, 2022
Cash-strapped UW seeking video game coordinator

Cash-strapped UW seeking video game coordinator

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — The University of Wisconsin System seems to always be struggling to find enough operating cash….

Read More »

December 1, 2022

2 thoughts on “Republicans get big win in redistricting battle

  • Dallet insists again that the federal courts are the proper venue to resolve a state’s differences over political boundaries, that the state Supreme Court has no business getting into “the political thickets” of redistricting.” Too bad this bimbo was able to get into the SCOTWIS. She lied all during her campaign about her record as a liberal. I simply do not understand why the conservative people on the court don’t force the long standing rule of “recusal” for obtaining campaign funds from actors involved in a case. If it wasa Republican the media would be going ballistic about this.

  • Hello,

    Thank you for your truthful reporting! It’s amazing how much Fake News surrounds us. Since the largest insurrection in the history of this country occurred on Nov 3, 2020, this is the biggest story of our time, and the future of our country hinges on correcting the problems that occurred in that election. Direct payments of funds from private companies to election officials and election process intervention has never occurred on such a large scale in this country. Additionally, it was well established before November 2020 that our electronic voting machines could easily be hacked, and they certainly were hacked in 2020 (see fix2020first.com). As a frequent reader of your content, I would like you to know that we would like to see continual updates on investigations of the 2020 election. You cannot overwhelm this topic – it begs for coverage since the Fake News and Big Tech have silenced this topic from their platforms.

    Thank you and may God Bless you in your work and give you courage to report the truth.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *