Avatar
All Posts by Empower Wisconsin

Supreme Court strikes down Evers’ lockdown

Empower Wisconsin | May 13, 2020

By M.D. Kittle 

MADISON — Declaring that the state’s top health official wrongly bypassed legislative oversight, the Wisconsin Supreme Court on Wednesday struck down the Evers’ administration’s extended lockdown of the state. 

The 4-3 decision by the conservative-led court declares Wisconsin Department of Health Services Secretary-designee Andrea Palm’s  Emergency Order 28 “unlawful, invalid, and unenforceable.” 

“Because Palm did not follow the law in creating Order 28, there can be no criminal penalties for violations of her order,” the ruling notes. “The procedural requirements of Wis. Stat. ch. 227 must be followed because they safeguard all people.”

Palm’s extended order, issued before Evers’ first stay-at-home edict was set to expire on April 24, criminalized what are generally constitutionally-protected activities — free travel, operating a business, attending church, among other such lockdown “crimes.”  

That’s a point outgoing Justice Daniel Kelly drove home during last week’s oral arguments before the court. 

“We require standard pre-exists as a matter of law. … The secretary all by herself created a criminal law,” Kelly told a state Department of Justice attorney defending the order. “Your position is the Secretary can identify behavior that is not otherwise criminal, that she can, all by herself, sit down at her computer keyboard, write up a description of behavior, and make it criminal?” Kelly asked.

The attorney, Assistant Attorney General Collin Roth, was forced to concede the point. 

Bars, restaurants, and other businesses that Team Evers deemed “nonessential” as part of the administration’s response to the COVID-19 outbreak would be able to re-open, although local jurisdictions could still implement restrictive public safety rules. Evers and the Republican-led Legislature will now have to come to terms on a compromise response to the pandemic, a tall order for two deeply divided political sides. 

Not surprisingly, the court’s two liberal justices dissented. But so did the court’s newest conservative, Justice Brian Hagedorn, who filed a dissenting opinion in which justices Ann Walsh Bradley and Rebecca Dallet partially joined. 

Hagedorn’s argument is that the case, Wisconsin Legislature v. Palm, is not a “battle over the constitutional limits on executive power.” Hagedorn insists the case is much duller than that, mainly about whether the commands in the order were required to be promulgated as an administrative rule under Wisconsin statute. 

In short, the Legislature has no standing. 

“I conclude the Legislature as a constitutional body whose interests lie in enacting, not enforcing the laws lacks standing to bring this claim,” Hagedorn wrote. “Such claims should be raised by those injured by the enforcement action, not by the branch of government who drafted the laws on which the executive branch purports to rely.” 

A case pending before the court, filed by two Wisconsin citizens, does indeed raise clear constitutional questions, alleging the government’s abuse of myriad civil liberties. 

According to Hagedorn’s reasoning, Palm’s DHS has the authority to enforce the penalties that its emergency order effectively created.  

Conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley wrote that her colleague’s argument lacked “constitutional analysis,” and that it “affirmatively rejects the constitution, and subjugates liberty.”

The majority opinion, written by Chief Justice Patience Roggensack, argues the case is about “the assertion of power by one unelected official, Andrea Palm.” And Palm, the majority notes, was and is subject to statutory emergency rule making procedures established by the Legislature. 

“Accordingly, the rulemaking procedures of Wis. Stat. § 227.24 were required to be followed during the promulgation of Order 28. Because they were not, Emergency Order 28 is unenforceable,” Roggensack wrote. “Because Palm did not follow the law in creating Order 28, there can be no criminal penalties for violations of her order. The procedural requirements of Wis. Stat. ch. 227 must be followed because they safeguard all people.”

Evers authority to unilaterally act under state law ended on Monday. He attempted to circumvent the emergency statute by having Palm sign the order. 

The lockdown, the administration contends, was about “flattening the curve” of virus spread, ensuring ample health care resources and protecting citizens. But the metrics he laid out to re-open the state have been met and Wisconsin’s hospitals have plenty of available resources to treat serious COVID-19 cases. Only 11 of the 43 states that issued stay-at-home orders still have lockdowns in place.  

Meanwhile, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday warned of a prolonged recession spurred by the freeze of economic activity. The U.S. unemployment rate in April approached 15 percent. In Wisconsin, more than a half million people have lost their jobs in the two-plus months of the lockdowns. 

The Supreme Court’s majority opinion does not conclude that Palm “was without any power to act in the face fo this pandemic.” 

“However, Palm must follow the law that is applicable to state-wide emergencies. We further conclude that Palm’s order confining all people to their homes, forbidding travel and closing businesses exceeded the statutory authority … upon which Palm claims to rely,” the opinion states. 

Without legislative oversight, a single elected official could “create law applicable to all people during the course of COVID-19 and subject people to imprisonment when they disobeyed her order,” the ruling states.

Listen to more:

Explore More
Biden’s stagnation plan

Biden’s stagnation plan

If you like stagnation and recession, you’re going to love Joe Biden’s tax plan. That’s according to Larry Kudlow, President Trump’s top economic advisor. 

Read More »

October 21, 2020
All Woke Up: AP’s quiet riot

All Woke Up: AP’s quiet riot

The Associated Press, which likes to think of itself as the “definitive source of independent journalism,” is now advising against reporters using the term “riot” when describing, well, a riot. 

Read More »

October 21, 2020
UW students paid to take COVID tests

UW students paid to take COVID tests

University of Wisconsin-Madison students can pick up a quick $10 — if they agree to take a COVID-19 test. A source this week told Empower Wisconsin that some students were earning as much as $40 per COVID test, so we checked into it.

Read More »

October 21, 2020
1.8 million ‘ghost voters’

1.8 million ‘ghost voters’

Judicial Watch has released a comparison study of Census Bureau population statistics and state voter registration data to reveal a notable disparity. The watch dog group is now warning of potential voter fraud and “dirty” voter rolls.

Read More »

October 21, 2020
Stoughton teaching racist antiracism

Stoughton teaching racist antiracism

For parents who believe fleeing liberal cities for the suburbs will free their children from the racist Woke indoctrination smothering public school curriculum, think again. 

Read More »

October 20, 2020
Facebook turns lights out on La Crosse Republicans

Facebook turns lights out on La Crosse Republicans

On Monday evening, the La Crosse County Republican Party learned that the social network giant had turned the lights out on its Facebook page — just two weeks before the November election. 

Read More »

October 20, 2020

6 thoughts on “Supreme Court strikes down Evers’ lockdown

  • What I wonder about is, since KELLY has been unseated by a lefty, and he was part of the 4-3 majority, will the new judge then demand that the decision be revisited and overturned? Popcorn time.

  • “We are a nation not of men but of laws.”
    And those laws are interpreted by…men.
    Not to take issue with the ruling, which I agree with, but doesn’t it seem that more and more often, these important Supreme
    Court decisions, on both the state and federal level, are divided along ideological “party lines”, this in an institution whose function is to interpret the written word, as written?
    A sorry situation, but it can’t be helped I suppose.

  • The Governor’s eagerness to ignore State law and overstep his authority now places Wisconsin in a potentially perilous position. Instead of accepting the limits of his authority, in true socialist fashion he squandered the 30 day period by not working with the legislature to construct a rational, gradual reopening, perhaps modifying Phase 1 of Fauci’s 3-Phase plan.

    Instead, Evers has turned Wisconsin into a giant petri dish and science project: Will our low prevalence rate (only 10,000 cases and a low hospitalization, ICU, and death rates) suddenly spike? Will local communities have widely varying guidelines, laws, enforcement? And there is no control group: Even with a rational plan, thee would have been an increase in cases; so the inevitable increase, if low, can’t be blamed necessarily on widespread reopening.
    This is a colossal failure of government. Once businesses reopen, it will be impossible to reverse the trend and retighten restrictions. My own opinion: It is now even more important for the high-risk to remain sequestered until the results of the juvenile science project are better defined.

    Had Evers and Palm not been drunk on control and power and had they more respect for the rule of law limiting their authority, perhaps they would have used the 30 day period more wisely. But, then again, they are socialists. Shut up and pay your taxes, we’ll make the decisions.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *