Avatar
All Posts by Empower Wisconsin

The Verdict: Judge Barrett right for Supreme Court

Empower Wisconsin | Sept 29, 2020

By editors, National Review 

Judge Amy Coney Barrett, President Trump’s nominee to fill the Supreme Court vacancy left by Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death, is an intelligent and thoughtful conservative who has demonstrated a career-long commitment to the rule of law. Judging from the criticisms she has been receiving from Democrats, there is no compelling case against her.

The first of those arguments is that it is improper to fill the seat during a presidential election, even though it is obviously within the constitutional powers of the president and the Senate. (We will leave aside, as beneath the dignity of any adult, the consideration that Ginsburg wanted a delay.) But the norm that Republicans are allegedly violating does not really exist. The absence of election-season confirmations in the historical record has more to do with accidents of circumstance than with any perceived impropriety. Only three vacancies have opened between August 1 and Election Day, and the Senate was out of session until after the election in all three cases. Democrats and the press have recently been citing the case of Chief Justice Roger Taney’s death in October 1864. They generally neglect to mention that, not only was the Senate out of session at the time, but Lincoln deliberately dangled the nomination to keep potential nominees interested in campaigning for him. (When the Senate returned in December, Lincoln’s nominee was confirmed the day he was nominated.)

The Barrett-specific arguments against confirmation are, if anything, weaker. When Barrett was up for her current appellate judgeship in 2017, Senator Dianne Feinstein attempted, notoriously, to portray her as a religious extremist who could not be trusted to apply the law without bias. At that time Barrett said, “I see no conflict between having a sincerely held faith and duties as a judge. I would never impose my own personal convictions upon the law.” As a law student more than 20 years ago, she co-authored an article arguing that a judge who opposes the death penalty on religious grounds might have to recuse himself in certain cases. Note, however, that even in that theoretical case, her view was that the judge should not try to force the law to comply with the dictates of her faith. And she has not seen any need to recuse herself from death-penalty (or abortion or immigration) cases.

Read more at National Review.

Listen to more:

Explore More
Wisconsin Spotlight: Election scandal recusal

Wisconsin Spotlight: Election scandal recusal

MADISON — Wisconsin Elections Commission staff will not be involved in reviewing a complaint alleging Green Bay city officials allowed…

Read More »

April 20, 2021
Biden to push Critical Race Theory on U.S. schools

Biden to push Critical Race Theory on U.S. schools

By Stanley Kurtz MADISON — The woke revolution in the classroom is about to go federal. In an early but…

Read More »

April 20, 2021
Lessons learned from spring school board elections

Lessons learned from spring school board elections

By Libby Sobic The COVID-19 pandemic seemed to set up the perfect opportunity for education reform to sweep across the…

Read More »

April 20, 2021
Meckler: Momentum growing for Convention of States

Meckler: Momentum growing for Convention of States

UPDATED VERSION: Corrects the names of the committees involved in passage.  By M.D. Kittle MADISON — The Convention of States…

Read More »

April 19, 2021
All Woke Up: California’s bad math

All Woke Up: California’s bad math

For most, 1+1 = 2. For the painfully Woke, math = white supremacy. As Fox News reports, California’s education department…

Read More »

April 19, 2021
Tool of the Week: Politics-first Josh Kaul

Tool of the Week: Politics-first Josh Kaul

MADISON — Last week, the Republican-led Legislature had to vote on a resolution requiring Attorney General Josh Kaul to follow…

Read More »

April 18, 2021
Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *