Avatar
All Posts by Empower Wisconsin

‘Wisconsin Constitution IS the law’

Empower Wisconsin | May 15, 2020

By M.D. Kittle

MADISON — It came as little surprise that the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s liberal wing disagreed with Wednesday’s majority ruling striking down the Evers administration lockdown.

Justices Ann Walsh Bradley and Rebecca Dallet have shown numerous times that they’ll ignore the constitution to protect their liberal allies. In this case, they stood up for the unchecked power of a liberal executive branch and against civil liberties. Rest assured, they would have been champions of the constitution had former Gov. Scott Walker been in power and his administration had issued the same overreaching emergency orders.

What concerns many constitution-first conservatives, however, is Justice Brian Hagedorn’s dissent of his fellow conservative’s ruling. One legal expert called Hagedorn’s dissenting opinion “lawyerly.”

The justice argues that the case, Wisconsin Legislature v. Palm, is not a “battle over the constitutional limits on executive power.” It’s about whether the Department of Health Services Secretary-designee Andrea Palm has the authority to issue a sweeping emergency order — with criminal penalties — without first promulgating it, a process that requires legislative oversight.

True, the case on its face is not a constitutional challenge — but the constitution is at its core, according to the majority.

Conservative Justice Rebecca G. Bradley took her colleague to task, writing that Hagedorn’s  argument lacked “constitutional analysis,” and that it “affirmatively rejects the constitution, and subjugates liberty.”

As Bradley points out, all governmental power derives “from the consent of the governed.” Government officials may act only within the confines of the authority the people give them.

“The people of Wisconsin never consented to any elected official, much less an unelected cabinet secretary, having the power to create law, execute it, and enforce it,” Bradley wrote. That’s why the people created three co-equal branches of government.

“However well-intentioned, the secretary-designee of the Department of Health Services exceeded her powers by ordering the people of Wisconsin to follow her commands or face imprisonment for noncompliance,” the justice wrote.

Palm “arrogated unto herself the power to make the law and the power to execute it, excluding the people from the lawmaking process…” The dissenters, in short, insist the law gave Palm such broad authority. Even if that is the case, the law would be unconstitutional.

Statutory law is subordinate to the constitution, Bradley said.

“Spurning more than two centuries of fundamental constitutional law as well as the Wisconsin Constitution’s guarantee of liberty, Justice Brian Hagedorn shockingly proclaims ‘the judiciary must never cast aside our laws or the constitution itself in the name of liberty.’”

She asserts Hagedorn’s 53-page opinion “contains no constitutional analysis whatsoever, affirmatively rejects the constitution, and subjugates liberty.”

Rick Esenberg, president and general counsel for the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, said to some extent, Hagedorn is making a “lawyerly” dissension.

“What Justice Hagedorn was saying is that the Legislature didn’t raise the constitutional issue,” Esenberg said. “I think he was making a distinction in a way that he didn’t have to address those constitutional issues, but read the statute as it is.”

WILL filed an amicus brief arguing that the Evers administration overstepped its constitutionally-granted authority.

In many ways, Hagedorn’s approach is what conservative jurists have favored, a reading of the law as written.

But Bradley argues reading the law as written fails when the law violates the constitution.

“The Wisconsin Constitution IS the law — and it reigns supreme over any statute,” the justice wrote.

Listen to more:

Explore More
Tool of the Week: Politics-first Josh Kaul

Tool of the Week: Politics-first Josh Kaul

MADISON — Last week, the Republican-led Legislature had to vote on a resolution requiring Attorney General Josh Kaul to follow…

Read More »

April 18, 2021
All Woke Up: California’s bad math

All Woke Up: California’s bad math

For most, 1+1 = 2. For the painfully Woke, math = white supremacy. As Fox News reports, California’s education department…

Read More »

April 18, 2021
Meckler: Momentum growing for Convention of States

Meckler: Momentum growing for Convention of States

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — The Convention of States movement to rein in the ever-expanding federal government has been energized…

Read More »

April 18, 2021
Sources: Verona teacher tells students, ‘all cops are racist’

Sources: Verona teacher tells students, ‘all cops are racist’

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — The parent of a Verona High School student said an English teacher recently taught her…

Read More »

April 16, 2021
Evers wants all the money

Evers wants all the money

By M.D. Kittle MADISON — The Republican-controlled Assembly on Tuesday passed a package of bills directing how the state should…

Read More »

April 16, 2021
Coalition: Fix damage done by ‘lost year’ in education

Coalition: Fix damage done by ‘lost year’ in education

By M.D. Kittle MADISON —A coalition of conservative organizations is urging Wisconsin policymakers to use federal pandemic relief funds to…

Read More »

April 16, 2021

3 thoughts on “‘Wisconsin Constitution IS the law’

  • We need, at the state and federal constitution level, either a definitive SCOTUS ruling limiting the crisis intervention exploitation or laws passed doing the same, preferably both. Martial law is defined and limited for a valid reason. Imperious edicts by power-hungry bureaucrats require even stricter controls – there is no clause in either constitution that includes “except as decided by despots in purported crisis” as a valid justification for rights abuse.

  • I listened to Rick Esenberg on Vicki McKenna’s show. I like Rick – a lot – and respect the work he has done for civil liberties. But, alas, sometimes Rick is too much the gentleman lawyer and views things through a scholar’s lens. Rebecca Bradley and Dan Kelly (especially Bradley) hit it out of the park in their concurrences. Dissimilar to the dissent filed by Brian Hagedorn (is he angling to be WI’s Anthony Kennedy, or worse, David Souter?), I assert that Constitutions – U.S. and WI – are at the heart of the issue. This is basic Con Law I separation of powers. Note: I have always had issues with the constitutionality of administrative agencies, which are empowered to legislate (rule making), prosecute and adjudicate – all in one convenient, tyrannical location. While many will want to lay this at the feet of Evers, this is really about the unconscionable leftist Eva Peron wannabe, Andrea Palm; Evers speaks whenever someone from WEAC shoves his /her hand up Ever’s rear portal and maneuvers his emaciated lips. Let this be an object lesson to you, WI – at least those who value fundamental, GOD-given liberties – there are consequences to installing power mad DUMs of the Borg Colony collective in positions of governmental power. Walker and Schimel respected the organic law and particularly the consent of the governed. You have at least two more years of this, at the least. Worse, given what occurred this past April, along with the questionable status of “Justice” Hagedorn, you may be fighting to hold on to the prosperous and free existences you once had.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *