‘Wisconsin Constitution IS the law’

Empower Wisconsin | May 15, 2020

By M.D. Kittle

MADISON — It came as little surprise that the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s liberal wing disagreed with Wednesday’s majority ruling striking down the Evers administration lockdown.

Justices Ann Walsh Bradley and Rebecca Dallet have shown numerous times that they’ll ignore the constitution to protect their liberal allies. In this case, they stood up for the unchecked power of a liberal executive branch and against civil liberties. Rest assured, they would have been champions of the constitution had former Gov. Scott Walker been in power and his administration had issued the same overreaching emergency orders.

What concerns many constitution-first conservatives, however, is Justice Brian Hagedorn’s dissent of his fellow conservative’s ruling. One legal expert called Hagedorn’s dissenting opinion “lawyerly.”

The justice argues that the case, Wisconsin Legislature v. Palm, is not a “battle over the constitutional limits on executive power.” It’s about whether the Department of Health Services Secretary-designee Andrea Palm has the authority to issue a sweeping emergency order — with criminal penalties — without first promulgating it, a process that requires legislative oversight.

True, the case on its face is not a constitutional challenge — but the constitution is at its core, according to the majority.

Conservative Justice Rebecca G. Bradley took her colleague to task, writing that Hagedorn’s  argument lacked “constitutional analysis,” and that it “affirmatively rejects the constitution, and subjugates liberty.”

As Bradley points out, all governmental power derives “from the consent of the governed.” Government officials may act only within the confines of the authority the people give them.

“The people of Wisconsin never consented to any elected official, much less an unelected cabinet secretary, having the power to create law, execute it, and enforce it,” Bradley wrote. That’s why the people created three co-equal branches of government.

“However well-intentioned, the secretary-designee of the Department of Health Services exceeded her powers by ordering the people of Wisconsin to follow her commands or face imprisonment for noncompliance,” the justice wrote.

Palm “arrogated unto herself the power to make the law and the power to execute it, excluding the people from the lawmaking process…” The dissenters, in short, insist the law gave Palm such broad authority. Even if that is the case, the law would be unconstitutional.

Statutory law is subordinate to the constitution, Bradley said.

“Spurning more than two centuries of fundamental constitutional law as well as the Wisconsin Constitution’s guarantee of liberty, Justice Brian Hagedorn shockingly proclaims ‘the judiciary must never cast aside our laws or the constitution itself in the name of liberty.’”

She asserts Hagedorn’s 53-page opinion “contains no constitutional analysis whatsoever, affirmatively rejects the constitution, and subjugates liberty.”

Rick Esenberg, president and general counsel for the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, said to some extent, Hagedorn is making a “lawyerly” dissension.

“What Justice Hagedorn was saying is that the Legislature didn’t raise the constitutional issue,” Esenberg said. “I think he was making a distinction in a way that he didn’t have to address those constitutional issues, but read the statute as it is.”

WILL filed an amicus brief arguing that the Evers administration overstepped its constitutionally-granted authority.

In many ways, Hagedorn’s approach is what conservative jurists have favored, a reading of the law as written.

But Bradley argues reading the law as written fails when the law violates the constitution.

“The Wisconsin Constitution IS the law — and it reigns supreme over any statute,” the justice wrote.

Listen to more:

Explore More

  • Tool of the Week: Grow Government Gov. Tony Evers

    Empower Wisconsin | Jan. 30, 2023 MADISON — Gov. Tony Evers has told a lot of whoppers during his time…

  • Senators warn Biden: No debt ceiling deal without reforms

    Empower Wisconsin | Jan. 30, 2023 The fiscal hawks are sticking to their guns. On Friday, Sens. Ron Johnson (R-WI)…

  • Milwaukee County supervisor resigns amid misconduct questions

    Empower Wisconsin | January 30, 2023 A Milwaukee County Supervisor has resigned under a cloud of misconduct in office allegations….

  • PowerUp: Big Money Left all in on Wisconsin Supreme Court race

    Empower Wisconsin January 27, 2023 The national left is all in on Wisconsin’s crucial Supreme Court race, a contest that…

  • Senators re-introduce No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act

    Empower Wisconsin | Jan. 27, 2023 The No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, the lawmakers say, attempts to clean up…

  • All Woke Up: ‘Affirming care’ for sadomasochists

    Empower Wisconsin | Jan. 27, 2023 The Hippocratic Oath doesn’t include a command that physicians provide “affirming care” for patients…

  1. ConLawyer.2 Avatar

    I listened to Rick Esenberg on Vicki McKenna’s show. I like Rick – a lot – and respect the work he has done for civil liberties. But, alas, sometimes Rick is too much the gentleman lawyer and views things through a scholar’s lens. Rebecca Bradley and Dan Kelly (especially Bradley) hit it out of the park in their concurrences. Dissimilar to the dissent filed by Brian Hagedorn (is he angling to be WI’s Anthony Kennedy, or worse, David Souter?), I assert that Constitutions – U.S. and WI – are at the heart of the issue. This is basic Con Law I separation of powers. Note: I have always had issues with the constitutionality of administrative agencies, which are empowered to legislate (rule making), prosecute and adjudicate – all in one convenient, tyrannical location. While many will want to lay this at the feet of Evers, this is really about the unconscionable leftist Eva Peron wannabe, Andrea Palm; Evers speaks whenever someone from WEAC shoves his /her hand up Ever’s rear portal and maneuvers his emaciated lips. Let this be an object lesson to you, WI – at least those who value fundamental, GOD-given liberties – there are consequences to installing power mad DUMs of the Borg Colony collective in positions of governmental power. Walker and Schimel respected the organic law and particularly the consent of the governed. You have at least two more years of this, at the least. Worse, given what occurred this past April, along with the questionable status of “Justice” Hagedorn, you may be fighting to hold on to the prosperous and free existences you once had.

  2. tony Avatar

    Eves is a democrat,a liar and a baby killer(Planned Murder Hood) a proud member!

  3. Harold Wilkes Avatar
    Harold Wilkes

    We need, at the state and federal constitution level, either a definitive SCOTUS ruling limiting the crisis intervention exploitation or laws passed doing the same, preferably both. Martial law is defined and limited for a valid reason. Imperious edicts by power-hungry bureaucrats require even stricter controls – there is no clause in either constitution that includes “except as decided by despots in purported crisis” as a valid justification for rights abuse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *